Book Release – L. J. Anderson – Author and Blogger

Why Contextual Absolutism Changes Everything

Christians know the Bible well enough to recognize tension. One verse says, “No one is righteous, no not one” (Romans 3:10). Another says, “Noah was a righteous man” (Genesis 6:9). So, which is it? If we treat both verses flatly, they contradict. If we deny one side, we shrink Scripture. And if we wave our hands and call it “mystery,” we end up hiding behind a word that Scripture itself rarely uses in that way.

There must be a better way.

The Tribulation is Wrath and the Church Must Wake Up

Tribulation as Wrath is officially available!

This book is short, focused, and provocative. It doesn’t waste your time with endless speculation or rehashed debates. Instead, it goes straight to the core: Revelation’s treatment of divine wrath.

Too many Christians today have adopted views of the end times that downplay God’s judgment. They treat the seal and trumpet judgments as warnings or natural disasters. Basically, anything but the wrath of God. But Revelation 6 seems to clearly indicate that it is the wrath of the Lamb at play.

What If God’s Wrath Starts Sooner Than We Thought?

Many Christians agree that the church won’t endure the wrath of God, but what if we’ve misunderstood when that wrath begins?

For decades, the debate over the rapture has centered on timing—pretrib, midtrib, posttrib, and, more recently, prewrath. But beneath these views lies a deeper, often-ignored question:
What actually constitutes God’s wrath in Revelation?

The Hidden Cost of Losing Inerrancy

If Scripture is not inerrant, then who gets to decide what part of it is true?

This is not a scare tactic. It’s a question of theological method. And one the modern church rarely slows down to ask.

The debate over inerrancy is often portrayed as academic, antiquated, or unnecessary. “Why fight over a word?” some say. “Let’s just focus on Jesus.” But this kind of thinking reveals a dangerous trend: we’ve grown far too comfortable placing Scripture under human evaluation rather than the other way around.

And the moment Scripture becomes suspect, everything becomes negotiable.

The Line in the Sand: Why Inerrancy Still Matters

For decades, theologians have debated whether inerrancy is a helpful term, a divisive term, or even a necessary one. Some prefer “infallibility,” others think we’ve outgrown the entire conversation. But here’s the problem: Scripture never gave us permission to step back from what it says about itself.

Preorder Now: The Inerrancy of Scripture

Why This Foundational Doctrine Still Matters

Is the Bible truly without error? Or have modern thinkers simply lowered the bar for what they’re willing to believe?

I’m pleased to announce that my next short book, The Inerrancy of Scripture, is now available for preorder, with the official release set for July 1st. This is an expanded version of a chapter originally published in Contending for the Truth, now given the space and focus it deserves.

New Release: The Moral Argument

Why Universal Morals Still Matter in Apologetics

I’m excited to announce the release of a new short book from Lamad Press: The Moral Argument. This work is an expanded, standalone version of a chapter originally published in Contending for the Truth, but it quickly became clear that the argument needed to breathe on its own. Why? Because most Christians (and most search engines) aren’t looking for apologetics content buried in a book titled Contending for the Truth. They’re looking for answers to specific questions. And this book addresses one of the most common and neglected ones: Can morality point to God?

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: